Archive for the ‘Harrassment’ Category

ACLU Claims Illinois Eavesdropping Law Unconstitutional

By Jeff L in Attorney Services, Background Checks, Chicago, Crime, Criminal Background Check, Criminal Records, Harrassment, Illinois, Investigations, MSI Detective Services, Police Records, Privacy, Private Investigator, Safety, Screening, Security, Surveillance Services, Technology, eavesdropping, harassment, hidden cameras, invasion of privacy, taps at August 25th, 2010 | No comments

No_RecordingTwo hungry brothers and their roommate decided to make a food run to a local McDonald’s in DeKalb last fall. The three Northern Illinois University students were unaware that what started as a simple burger run would become a news event, involving police, the ACLU, and the US Constitution. After securing some grub, the three men were pulled over by a police officer–supposedly because the unnamed roommate was driving erratically.

Feeling uneasy over the DUI stop, Fanon Perteet readied his phone to record video of the police stop. Fanon’s act was illegal under the Illinois Eavesdropping Act and he was arrested for recording a police officer–a felony in the state. His brother, Adrian, was arrested soon after for recording his brother’s arrest. He, too, was informed that he’d committed a felony.

The brothers are among the growing number of Illinois’ residents who’ve made the news for criminal violations of the state’s eavesdropping law, which, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is unconstitutional. The ACLU has filed a lawsuit against against Cook County State Attorney Anita Alvarez that the recording the brothers made falls under the protection of the First Amendment: it’s a right for individuals and groups to share information about the police with the public.

Alvarez, when asked, stated that the law “…doesn’t just protect police officers, it protects all of you and every citizen of the state of Illinois.” There are just a couple states with laws similar to Illinois’; Massachusetts and Oregon. However, both states cover situations where hidden audio recordings of law enforcement officials is illegal.

The ACLU’s lawyers stated that group members monitor law enforcement and want to be given the ability to record officers without fear of arrests during demonstrations. The problem with the Illinois law is that it makes it illegal to record law enforcement in public spaces, where everyday citizens can’t expect the same protections. An ACLU spokesperson stated, “We’re not trying to get inside a police station house where the public isn’t invited,” he said. “We’re talking about standing on a street corner and making these recordings.”

Although citizens can’t make recordings, the police can. Squad cars in Illinois are equipped with both video and audio surveillance equipment to protect officers and the community. Yet, citizens are prosecuted for recording the police.

According to Professor Harold Krent, a Chicago-Kent constitutional law expert, the ACLU’s case is “a long shot.” The law cannot be contested, so the ACLU has to prove that it’s being enforced in some cases while not in others. According to Krent, “That’s a tough legal argument to make.” Chicago Police spokesperson said that any actions that interfere with police puts everyone at risk.

The Perteet brothers settled their cases by pleading to misdemeanor charges because they did not wish to face felonies.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Weld County private eye charged with stalking in very unique case

By MSI in Crime, Harrassment, Infidelity, Police Records, Privacy, Stalking Cases, Surveillance Services, Technology, gps, gps tracker, harassment, invasion of privacy, stalking at August 19th, 2010 | 1 comment

Here is a very unique story from Denver involving a PI who placed a GPS on a woman’s car on behalf of her husband. The case is ongoing and will have ramifications on what a private detective can and cannot do on behalf of a client. Of course my commentary here is that the husband client allegedly caused this by acting like a jerk (allegedly) and using the GPS to allegedly control and intimidate the wife. See the police report here to get the picture as to how these charges evolved. Read the full article »

Getting Someone Else’s Cell Phone Records is Illegal!

By MSI in Crime, Criminal Background Check, Criminal Records, Electronic Fraud, Electronic Theft, Harrassment, Investigations, Police Records, Privacy, Private Investigator, Security, harassment, invasion of privacy at July 22nd, 2010 | No comments

We all should know that obtaining cell phone records of someone else is illegal. What many want to know is the exact section of law which prohibits it. This would pertain to attempting to get them, getting them, possessing and retaining them – anything and everything pertaining to them.

See H.R. 4709: Law Enforcement and Phone Privacy Protection Act of 2006,
and S. 2178: Consumer Telephone Records Protection Act of 2006.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Video Voyeurism Law

By Jeff L in Chicago, Crime, Debugging - Electronic Countermeasures, Electronic Theft, Harrassment, Illinois, Investigations, MSI Detective Services, Privacy, Private Investigator, Safety, Security, Surveillance Services, Technology, eavesdropping, invasion of privacy, technorati at June 27th, 2010 | No comments

voyeurism.imgVideo voyeur laws exist in all 50 States, making it illegal to capture images of a person’s private areas without consent. In some states the crime is a felony while in others classify the crime as a gross misdemeanor.  State law provides citizens with a “reasonable expectation” of privacy.

Pictures or videos taken when people are disrobing in private, or believe they’re in private, are illegal.

For example, it’s reasonable to expect privacy in a bathroom, or standing in line at a store. Both places are areas where images of private parts would not normally be captured.

A number of cases in recent news:

Patrick Culmer, a 32-year-old Sacramento man, was sentenced in February to five days jail and ordered to complete a sex addiction program after pleading guilty for attempting to take images under the door of a fitting room where a woman was undressing.

Ty Standley, 35, was arrested in August after Sears store security said he followed a 10-year-old girl around at the Altamonte Mall. A jury found a Deltona man guilty Thursday night of snapping pictures up  girl’s skirt while she tied her shoes.

Terry Kristin Rauh, a 43-year-old teacher, is free on bail following his arrest in April on 10 counts of video voyeurism stemming from images found on an iPod of adult co-workers in the unisex bathroom of the teacher’s lounge. He maintains his innocence and formal charges have yet to be filed.

Patrick Wayne Flannigan, 42, was arrested by police on May 20 for violating a restraining order, coercion, and videoing an ex-girlfriend without her knowledge while she performed a sex act. He was caught when he sent the images to her.

Dr. Vincent Pacienza, 54, was found guilty on the felony charge of Unlawful Surveillance in the Second Degree. He faces up to four years in prison at his July 30 sentencing.  Pacienza, a cardiologist, will also face medical misconduct charges that may result in the suspension, or revocation, of his medical license. After serving jail time, he will be registered as a sex offender for 10 years.

If you have questions regarding illegal video, or photo, surveillance, please contact one of MSI’s detectives via e-mail or us call toll-free at (888)338-4545.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,