Archive for the ‘MSI Detective Services’ Category

New questions on state nursing home deal Firm has been paid nearly $2 million, but how did it get hired?

By MSI in Attorney Services, Background Checks, Chicago, Crime, Criminal Background Check, Criminal Records, Illinois, MSI Detective Services, Police Records, Safety, Screening, Surveillance Services at March 10th, 2010 | No comments
March 8, 2010

Four years ago, after revelations that registered sex offenders and other ex-cons were living among some of society’s most vulnerable people in Illinois nursing homes, the heat was on state officials.

A series of Chicago Sun-Times reports had documented attacks on nursing home residents and revealed that the ex-cons, many of them under 50, were living in the homes, often unbeknownst to other residents or even to employees of the facilities.

In response, the General Assembly passed a law making Illinois the first state in the nation to require criminal background checks on all nursing home residents.

And the state Department of Public Health acted quickly to make that happen. It hired two security companies on a no-bid, “emergency” basis to help dig up any details about nursing home residents who had criminal pasts.

Now, amid new concerns over nursing home safety, a task force convened by Gov. Quinn has concluded that the law hasn’t done enough to ensure that those who live in nursing homes are safe. It’s urging state health and law enforcement officials to get together and “resolve this problem.”

Here’s a place to start: by digging a little deeper into the background of anyone they hire to dig into the backgrounds of nursing home residents. Had health officials done that from the very beginning, red flags might have popped up.

For one, the head of one of the security companies the health department hired in summer 2006 — V.I.P. Security & Detective Services, of Matteson — reported on its contract that the company had been in business for two years and had annual sales of $50,000.

V.I.P., however, had been incorporated just three months before, according to state records that the Department of Public Health could have checked at the Illinois secretary of state’s office.

Also, despite the “Security & Detective Services” part of its name, V.I.P. didn’t obtain the state licenses it needed to operate as a security and detective agency until Sept. 8, 2006 — the same day that the health department signed the deal to hire the company for $400,000 for six months without seeking competitive bids to do the work, records show.

The Department of Public Health has given V.I.P. three subsequent contracts to stay on the job. So far, it’s paid the company a total of nearly $2 million.

For that money, the background checks V.I.P. helps compile often “contain incomplete information” and “are not completed on time,” according to a report last month from Quinn’s task force. In October, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan criticized health officials for failing to audit or even “spot check” V.I.P.’s work.

It’s tough to gauge exactly how much blame VIP deserves. Officials would not release copies of its reports, citing patient confidentiality laws. And the company isn’t the only player involved. Nursing homes themselves start the process of obtaining criminal background checks on new residents. And the Illinois State Police, two health department employees and a forensic psychologist — who has been paid $833,918 by the health department since 2006 — all have roles in determining whether nursing home residents who have committed crimes might pose a risk to others in the homes.

Still, in light of the new spotlight on nursing home safety, it seems likely that V.I.P. will draw new scrutiny.

State records listed Bennie Bryant III as the company’s president and “director of operations” in 2006. He’s also a south suburban cop — a detective-sergeant with the Village of Phoenix police department, records show.

Bryant’s sister, Roxanne B. Jackson, is a lawyer who was the state health department’s human resources director in 2003 and 2004, back when the agency was headed by Dr. Eric Whitaker, who’s now a top executive at the University of Chicago Medical Center but is better known as a close friend of President Obama. In 2006, Jackson was V.I.P.’s “director of legal services,” records show.

In her 14 months on the state payroll as a full-time employee, Jackson also practiced law on the side, handling dozens of bankruptcy cases — including a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case for her parents, both of whom later would become corporate officers of V.I.P., records show.

Days after quitting her $100,000-a-year state job in October 2004, Jackson filed for bankruptcy herself. In the papers she filed with the Bankruptcy Court, she listed as income the $60,000 a year she said she made running her law firm but made no mention of the state job she had just quit. Both Jackson’s and her parents’ bankruptcy cases are now closed.

Jackson did legal work in 2005 for Tony Rezko, an adviser and top campaign fund-raiser for then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Rezko was convicted in June 2008 of wide-ranging corruption involving state deals. Jackson was not named in those proceedings, nor has she faced any criminal charges.

Besides Jackson, Bryant and their parents, records show V.I.P. also has included Bennie Bryant’s wife, Katrina, as a corporate officer and another brother, Derek Bryant, as director of safety.

The Sun-Times e-mailed both Jackson and Bennie Bryant questions about the company. Reached last week, Bennie Bryant described some of those questions as “erroneous” and said he would provide answers later.

Subsequently, though, neither he nor Jackson returned calls or responded to e-mail messages.

So why did the state hire V.I.P. in the first place? Melaney Arnold, a health department spokeswoman, said her agency “solicited recommendations from various state agencies and department offices” and came up with three names — V.I.P., Myers Service Inc. http://www.detectiveservices.com and a third company.

The agency ended up hiring V.I.P. and Myers on an emergency basis in 2006.

Arnold said state officials took V.I.P.’s word about its experience.

“When a vendor signs a contract, that vendor is certifying that everything it included in the contract is true and accurate,” Arnold said. “The length of time the vendor was in business was not a requirement of the contract and not a determining factor in signing the contract.”

Whitaker’s then-chief of staff, Quin Golden, signed the emergency contract on Whitaker’s behalf on the same day that the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation granted V.I.P. its state security- and detective-agency licenses.

In all, V.I.P. and Myers analyzed the criminal backgrounds of 1,521 convicted felons living in Illinois nursing homes by early 2007, when V.I.P. beat out Myers and two other firms in competitive bidding to hang on to the state deal.

Arnold said Jackson’s role as a former high-ranking health department employee had nothing to do with V.I.P. getting the state business.

Whitaker and Golden, also now working for the University of Chicago health system, weren’t involved in picking V.I.P. over Myers and the others, Arnold said.

“A one-year contract with the potential for two one-year renewals was awarded to V.I.P. in July 2007 as the result of a competitive-bid process,” Arnold said. “V.I.P. received the contract based on scoring the highest number of points.”


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Stopping a Stalker

By jefflouis in Attorney Services, Chicago, Crime, Illinois, MSI Detective Services, Most Wanted, Mug Shots, Safety, Security, Stalking Cases, Surveillance Services, Technology, legal papers, service of summons at February 9th, 2010 | No comments

Stalking

Our last post gave some definitions of stalking and statistics gathered by the various local and national law enforcement agencies in the United States.  
First things first; stalking is a difficult crime to stop because although your privacy may have been invaded, it’s possible that the stalker hasn’t actually broken the law, and the police and don’t have any cause for arrest.  Thus, it’s important that you document everything that happens, even if you aren’t entirely certain you’re being watched.  Several organizations are available to help.  The first is Arming Women Against .Rape and Endangerment, or AWARE.

AWARE has a ton of resources available to help a victim prior to their victimization.  In other words, to catch the stalker in the act.  They also offer services and counseling for victims if some sort of aggressive act has been taken toward the victim.  The second (by no means are there only two) is End Stalking in America (ESIA).  The ESIA works with victims and their families after someone in the family has had this type of invasive crime perpetrated against them.


The  ESIA came up with the following steps for ensuring your safety.  However, nothing is foolproof, or successful, at times best judgment must prevail.

  • Not listening to your intuition.
    You need to keep your internal radar tuned to pick up signals that something might be wrong.

  • Letting someone down easy, instead of saying a definitive NO, if you’re not interested in the relationship.
    Trying to be nice can lead a potentially obsessive suitor to hear what he or she wants instead of the message that you’re not interested.

  • Ignoring the early warning signs.
    The attention you find annoying now may escalate into dangerous harassment/and pursuit.
  • Responding to a stalker in any way, shape, or form.
    This means not acceding to your stalkers demands even once he or she has introduced threats.

  • Trying to reason or bargain with a stalker.
    Stalking is like a long rape.  Your natural reactions almost automatically put you at a disadvantage.

  • Seeking a restraining or protective order.
    All too often, this one act propels stalkers to act violently.  Still tempted to get that piece of paper?

  • Expecting police to solve your problem and make it go away.
    Even the Los Angeles Police Department’s Threat Management Unit says that victims have to take 100% responsibility for their dealing with the situation.

  • Taking inadequate privacy and safety precautions.

  • Neglecting to enlist the support of family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, therapists, and other victims.
    It may be tough to admit that you’re being stalked, but it’s not your fault.

p>

  • Ignoring emotional needs during and after a stalking.

Honestly, no one wants to incite violence in what may already be a violent act, but being prepared for anything is the key. This includes knowing  where you are, not staying out to the middle of the morning by yourself, or using the buddy system. There are many non-lethal forms of fighting (ie, not a gun or knife) that may save your life. A course in self defense is one way to take the element of surprise away from your attacker. A small vial of Pepper Spray will make the toughest person think twice after getting an eyeful of burning spray.  Personal alarms are a great way to let other’s know that you are in trouble. However, we don’t advocate fighting back unless you think your life, or the lives of others, are in danger.

If you are being stalked, or fear you might be but aren’t sure, please email info@detectiveservices.com, or give us a call at anytime at (888)338-4545




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Notorious Bank Robber Continues To Elude FBI

By MSI in Chicago, Crime, Illinois, MSI Detective Services, Most Wanted, Mug Shots, Safety, Security, Stolen Property, Surveillance Services, Technology, Wanted, robbery at February 4th, 2010 | No comments

TCF Bandit Has Robbed 12 Banks In Chicago And Western Suburbs

CHICAGO (CBS)

He doesn’t change much about his appearance: same cap, same glasses. Each time, it’s the same technique as he hits his favorite bank at your local grocery store. So, why can’t they catch this guy? CBS 2 Chief Correspondent Jay Levine reports.

He’s got a three-year winning streak. Only one Chicago bank robber has hit more banks: 30 between the two of them. The other guy has apparently retired.

But not the TCF Bandit, so-called because 10 of his 12 jobs were at TCF branches inside Jewel supermarkets; including the latest this week in Countryside.

Each time, security cameras snap his picture. He’s wearing his usual ball cap and sunglasses.

“I have a gun,” he says, as usual, but has never even shown it. Not in Countryside, or at any of the other eight locations.

Bank jobs which began in February of 2007, and have continued in Chicago and its western suburbs for 36 months; until Monday’s heist which was his12th hit.

There’s now a $20,000 price on his head. It’s posted on FBI flyers and his picture is all over the FBI’s website:Bandit Tracker Chicago.

At what point does it become personal?

“I don’t think it ever becomes personal with the investigators, from my own experience,” said Chicago FBI spokesman Ross Rice. “It can become frustrating. It can make you more focused and want to solve the case.”

Neither Rice nor TCF will discuss security issues of supermarket banks.

But security consultant Perry Myers showed CBS 2 new technology available to them, questioning the positioning of their cameras.

“I notice they’re coming from the top down, which his baseball cap helps protect his face somewhat,” Myers said. “If they threw a few different angles in there, maybe a camera that was down on the counter shooting up, for a better look at face.”

Before the TCF bandit, there was the Wheaton Bandit, who pulled off 18 similar heists without getting caught. But he suddenly disappeared after someone saw him without a mask and the FBI widely circulated a sketch.

“Some people, including myself, think that he saw that sketch of himself,” Rice said. “He recognized how close he came to being caught and he stopped.”

The TCF bandit even went back to the same Franklin Park branch three times, another twice. So why hasn’t he been caught?

“The only thing we really have that’s a good lead is the photograph itself,” Rice said. “If you know this person and you see that photograph, you’re gonna recognize him.”

Ross Rice may say it never gets personal, and it is true, this guy hasn’t done anything to taunt his pursuers.

But the fact is, the FBI was created for and made its name catching bank robbers. Even though its main responsibility now is national security, seeing a guy rip off bank after bank and get away scot-free can’t be fun.

CBS 2 Political Producer Ed Marshall contributed to this report.

(© MMX, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)


Stalking: Definition & Statistics

By jefflouis in Attorney Services, Chicago, Crime, Harrassment, Illinois, MSI Detective Services, Stalking Cases, Surveillance Services at February 4th, 2010 | No comments

stalkingMen usually don’t have stalkers. At least not on television. Surprisingly, though, stalking is more gender-neutral that first thought. Studies conducted by the Department of Justice in the United States reports that, “Males were as likely to report being stalked by a male as a female offender: 43% percent of male stalking victims stated that the offender was female, while 41% of male victims stated that the offender was another male. Female victims of stalking were significantly more likely to be stalked by a male (67%) rather than a female (24%) offender.” Thus, while the majority of cases are of the type popularized by television, this is not always the case.

What is Stalking?

Stalking as defined by National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center as:


A repetitive pattern of unwanted, harassing or threatening behavior committed by one person against another. Acts include: telephone harassment, being followed, receiving unwanted gifts, and other similar forms of intrusive behavior. All states and the Federal Government have passed anti-stalking legislation. Definitions of stalking found in state anti-stalking statutes vary in their language, although most define stalking as “the willful, malicious, and repeated following and harassing of another person that threatens his or her safety

Remember that it is repeated, threatening behavior. This behavior can take both the form of  physical and virtual stalking.

As stalking is not geographically focused, all U.S. States and the Federal Government have laws regarding stalking and similar victimization. n January of 2009, The U.S. Department of Justice released a report based on a national crime victims survey of stalking and harassment victims.  Below are just a few of the statistics of this 16 page report.

  • During a 12-month period an estimated 14 in every 1,000 persons age 18 or older were victims of stalking
  • About half (46%) of stalking victims experienced at least one unwanted contact per week
  • 11% of victims said they had been stalked for 5 years or more
  • The risk of stalking victimization was highest for individuals who were divorced or separated-34 per 1,000 individuals
  • Women were at greater risk than men for stalking
  • About 43% of victims stated that police were contacted at least once regarding the stalking
  • Male (37%) and female (41%) stalking victimizations were equally likely to be reported to the police
  • Approximately 1 in 4 stalking victims reported some form of cyberstalking such as e-mail (83%) or instant messaging (35%). Electronic monitoring was used to stalk 1 in 13 victims (i.e. GPS monitoring, bugs, phone tapping, video)
  • 46% of stalking victims felt fear of not knowing what would happen next
  • Nearly 3 in 4 stalking victims knew their offender in some capacity.

Download the report.

In the next couple of posts, we’ll continue with further information and how you can action against stalking.

If you need advice for yourself, or a loved one, regarding stalking, contact Myers Detective Services. We can help you get the facts, and if necessary, begin an investigation.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Crime Drops Despite Record Gun Purchases

By jefflouis in Attorney Services, Chicago, Crime, Illinois, MSI Detective Services, Terrorism, Violence, murder at January 24th, 2010 | No comments


The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that the number of firearms purchased in the first half of 2009 was “going through the roof;” in direct comparison, the homicide rate in the United States dropped 10% nationally. The increase in legal gun sales jumped by 30% when compared to legal gun sales for the same time period one year prior.

Gun advocates state that this proves that more weapons among the populace does not increase crime, and in fact, may deter crime.  A survey conducted by the National Association of Chiefs of Police among the nation’s police executives found that nearly94% of those queried were for civilian gun ownership. Ninety-six percent of the police chiefs and sheriffs believe that the criminals who commit gun crimes obtain their weapons illegally, and that there weren’t many arrests for violations of the Federally-mandated waiting period. When the police executives were asked if concealed weapons permits would help reduce violent gun crime, 63% of the respondents answered positively.

According to Second Amendment Foundation, a civil rights group, state that this proves violent crime and gun ownership doesn’t have any correlation, and that arming citizens is a deterrent. SAF EVP Alan Gottleib stated;

“What this shows is that gun prohibitionists are all wrong when they argue that more guns result in more crime. Firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens are no threat to anyone. Perhaps violent criminals were actually discouraged by all of those gun sales earlier this year, because the media made a point of reporting the booming gun market.”

The opposite camp, those backing gun control, state that accidental shootings or abuse of firearms rises with an armed populace. However, according to the SAF and Northwestern University School of Law, there are endless studies that there have been between 600,000 and 1 million cases where firearms have been used by citizens to protect themselves and their loved-ones.

However, looking at the data empirically, the drop in crime rate and subsequent rise in gun purchases are in no way related, and the fact that more citizens are armed could not have possibly been known by gun-toting criminals due to the simple fact that the two incidents were occurring simultaneously. Not to mention the fact that the media has access to this type of information, and there weren’t a lot of stories running the past year about victims thwarting criminals by using guns. In fact, the only one to come to light in Chicago was an intended mugging on CTA’s Orange line where the victim turned the tables on his attackers, pulling a knife and stabbing two of the five attackers. As with most criminals, once the odds evened out, and with two of their posse down, the rest of the “men” fled and were later apprehended by police.

Data is simply data. Correlations between two totally unrelated events that seem related sometimes have nothing to do with one another. In this case, it is unlikely; rather, there is a reason that crime fell that had nothing to do with policing, armed citizens, and the like. What that something is has yet to be revealed, but the last major deterrence in crime was actually a result of Roe V. Wade being overthrown, allowing unwed mothers to abort fetuses that they could not hope to raise. This led to a decrease in the number of aimless teenagers, which led to a decrease in crime. (Freakonomics, pp. 5-6, Leavitt and Dubner)

So, although it would be nice to have the answer, we don’t, and may not for a couple of years.


Tags: , ,