Posts Tagged ‘video surveillance’

Government’s New Right to GPS Track Your Moves

By MSI in Crime, Debugging - Electronic Countermeasures, MSI Detective Services, Privacy, Security, Stalking Cases, Surveillance Services, Technology, eavesdropping, fraud, gps, gps tracker, invasion of privacy at August 25th, 2010 | 2 comments

We now learn it may be legal for the US Government to stalk you.  If you thought your Ex was bad enough, now your Uncle Sam can watch your moves by placing a GPS tracking device under your car without a court order!  Yikes!  Time to park in the garage?  This opens up US citizens to government tracking of your every move. The whole article can be viewed at http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599201315000.

US Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS Device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn’t violate your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway – and no reasonable expectation that the government isn’t tracking your movements.

Read the full article »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

ACLU Claims Illinois Eavesdropping Law Unconstitutional

By Jeff L in Attorney Services, Background Checks, Chicago, Crime, Criminal Background Check, Criminal Records, Harrassment, Illinois, Investigations, MSI Detective Services, Police Records, Privacy, Private Investigator, Safety, Screening, Security, Surveillance Services, Technology, eavesdropping, harassment, hidden cameras, invasion of privacy, taps at August 25th, 2010 | 2 comments

No_RecordingTwo hungry brothers and their roommate decided to make a food run to a local McDonald’s in DeKalb last fall. The three Northern Illinois University students were unaware that what started as a simple burger run would become a news event, involving police, the ACLU, and the US Constitution. After securing some grub, the three men were pulled over by a police officer–supposedly because the unnamed roommate was driving erratically.

Feeling uneasy over the DUI stop, Fanon Perteet readied his phone to record video of the police stop. Fanon’s act was illegal under the Illinois Eavesdropping Act and he was arrested for recording a police officer–a felony in the state. His brother, Adrian, was arrested soon after for recording his brother’s arrest. He, too, was informed that he’d committed a felony.

The brothers are among the growing number of Illinois’ residents who’ve made the news for criminal violations of the state’s eavesdropping law, which, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is unconstitutional. The ACLU has filed a lawsuit against against Cook County State Attorney Anita Alvarez that the recording the brothers made falls under the protection of the First Amendment: it’s a right for individuals and groups to share information about the police with the public.

Alvarez, when asked, stated that the law “…doesn’t just protect police officers, it protects all of you and every citizen of the state of Illinois.” There are just a couple states with laws similar to Illinois’; Massachusetts and Oregon. However, both states cover situations where hidden audio recordings of law enforcement officials is illegal.

The ACLU’s lawyers stated that group members monitor law enforcement and want to be given the ability to record officers without fear of arrests during demonstrations. The problem with the Illinois law is that it makes it illegal to record law enforcement in public spaces, where everyday citizens can’t expect the same protections. An ACLU spokesperson stated, “We’re not trying to get inside a police station house where the public isn’t invited,” he said. “We’re talking about standing on a street corner and making these recordings.”

Although citizens can’t make recordings, the police can. Squad cars in Illinois are equipped with both video and audio surveillance equipment to protect officers and the community. Yet, citizens are prosecuted for recording the police.

According to Professor Harold Krent, a Chicago-Kent constitutional law expert, the ACLU’s case is “a long shot.” The law cannot be contested, so the ACLU has to prove that it’s being enforced in some cases while not in others. According to Krent, “That’s a tough legal argument to make.” Chicago Police spokesperson said that any actions that interfere with police puts everyone at risk.

The Perteet brothers settled their cases by pleading to misdemeanor charges because they did not wish to face felonies.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Private Detectives Retained to Ensure Ethical Behavior

By Jeff L in Crime, Criminal Background Check, Criminal Records, Electronic Fraud, Electronic Theft, Investigations, MSI Detective Services, Police Records, Private Investigator, Safety, Screening, Security, Surveillance Services, Technology, fraud, legal papers, technorati at August 24th, 2010 | No comments

Private InvestigatorTwo former Maricopa County attorneys, Lisa Aubuchon (Deputy County Attorney) and Andrew Thomas (Country Attorney) launched investigations into graft and corruption in the county’s allegedly corrupt government. Their investigation led to charges against County Supervisors, and a County Judge, of racketeering charges. Following their investigations, Thomas was relieved of office and Aubuchon put on administrative leave due to claims that the investigations and charges were unethical. Read the full article »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Security by Committee” Doesn’t Work

By Jeff L in Investigations, MSI Detective Services, Privacy, Private Investigator, Safety, Screening, Security, Technology, Terrorism, technorati at August 11th, 2010 | 1 comment

SecuritySecurity decisions within the federal government don’t work according the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports. Federal institutions tend to make security decisions by forming committees that, when reviewed by the GAO, don’t have the information, or federal job rating necessary to “choose and to fund the appropriate measures to safeguard their facilities.”

Diverse federal departments are often located within the same building or complex, and each of the department chooses a representative to sit on the Federal Security Committee (FSC). The FSC addresses security issues and approves security countermeasures at the building.

The GAO, however, found two critical deficiencies within FSC’s organizational structure.

First, federal offices that occupy government buildings are not experienced, nor do they have training that’s necessary to assess complex security issues.

Perhaps even more problematic is that FSC committee members do not have authorization to allocate funding.  According to the report, FSC members have to request funds from higher up the chain, and funding isn’t available in a timely manner.

GAO_Investigation

Another disturbing issue brought to light was that the FSCs across the nation don’t have guidelines for operation; since 1995, FSCs have received no guidance for policies and procedures on steps necessary to make decisions or establish accountability.

Federal buildings are managed by the GSA (General Services Administration). However, they are protected by the Federal Protective Service, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security. The FPS’ mission is to assess federal building security, highlight vulnerabilities, and suggest methods to counteract building weaknesses.

Once completed, the report is submitted to the building FSC to determine which measures to enact and maintain.

The FSC’s lack of formal lines of communication and guidelines actually put federal offices at greater risk.

As an example, an FPS official recommended that 24-hour security measures be implemented at a government facility in a crime-ridden neighborhood. However, the recommendation was never enacted because the FSC could not garner approval from their diverse tenants. In another example, a federal building’s committee asked FPS inspectors to not recommend improvements, “because there is not sufficient funding in regional budgets to purchase and maintain the security equipment.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,